Robert M.

Paco N. any plans to publish this as RDF? 🙂

So far as I know SPARQL has nothing in it about access/authz/n, right?

have we moved on to classifying all the words of language? scope creep much?

thanks Trey B. that’s very cool. I did see that, but I think there’s still something about protocols that are driven by a single commercial entity (proprietary may be the wrong word here) as opposed to something which is a pan-entity standard like RDF?

Thank you very much Paco N. for such a comprehensive and lived response! And Thank you Bojan Božić for that W3C link, that’s exactly what I was wondering about. Unfortunately I’m not clear what the headline is here. What I’m understanding is:

Is that fair?

preserving from slack would be awesome… just be aware that a) this might violate the spirit of Slack’s own free-tier license; b) this would mean another 3rd party has access to data including PI of any of us in this instance, and this could then be passed to other (4th, 5th, 6th?) parties: including e.g. “…sponsors or promoters of any competition, sweepstakes, or promotion we run”